Counterfoil rule note
Quoted from a public specification. This page is not a validator, and it is not tax, legal, or accounting advice.
A UBL invoice should not include extensions
Source: https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/billing/3.0/rules/ubl-tc434/UBL-CR-001/
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0, May 2026 release, EN 16931 model bound to UBL
Severity note: warning, from the Flag column of the Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 UBL rules index retrieved 2026-10-18.
A UBL invoice should not include extensions. The statement says "should not", not "shall", and it has no period. It says "extensions" and does not say "the". The flag is warning. The context is the same string as BR-CO-18. The published test is not(ext:UBLExtensions). It does not call exists. It does not read a cbc child.
Leave extensions out of the UBL invoice.
Illustration of the condition in the official statement. Not an example published by the source.
Fails the stated condition. The invoice includes a UBL extension.
Passes the stated condition. The invoice includes no UBL extension.
Copied from the source. Not reimplemented on this page.
/ubl:Invoice | /cn:CreditNote
not(ext:UBLExtensions)
All rule notes · JSON · Markdown · llms.txt · Invoice page · Privacy