Counterfoil rule note
Quoted from a public specification. This page is not a validator, and it is not tax, legal, or accounting advice.
Scheme agency name attribute should not be present
Source: https://docs.peppol.eu/poacc/billing/3.0/rules/ubl-tc434/UBL-DT-09/
Peppol BIS Billing 3.0, May 2026 release, EN 16931 model bound to UBL
Severity note: warning, from the Flag column of the Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 UBL rules index retrieved 2026-10-18.
A scheme agency name attribute should not be present. The statement has no period and says should not. It does not say shall. It is 50 characters. The flag is warning. The context is the same string as BR-CO-18. The published test is not(//@schemeAgencyName). It does not call count and it does not call exists.
Leave the schemeAgencyName attribute off the document.
Illustration of the condition in the official statement. Not an example published by the source.
Fails the stated condition. The document includes a schemeAgencyName attribute.
Passes the stated condition. The document includes no schemeAgencyName attribute.
Copied from the source. Not reimplemented on this page.
/ubl:Invoice | /cn:CreditNote
not(//@schemeAgencyName)
All rule notes · JSON · Markdown · llms.txt · Invoice page · Privacy